MN - Vegetable IPM Newsletter

In this issue

Upper Midwest Fruit and Vegetable Growers Conference, February 2001

Efficacy Trials: Control of European corn borer in sweet corn: MN, y2k

Migrant Labor Camps in MN: Proposed New Rules

Pesticide Updates: Nova labeled for cucurbits, snap beans, etc.

Vol. 2 No. 18   November 17, 2000

Control of European Corn Borer in Sweet Corn: MN, y2k

R.L. Koch, P.K. O’Rourke, E.C. Burkness & W.D. Hutchison, Dept. of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

‘Jubilee’ was planted 15 May at the University of Minnesota Research and Outreach Center at Rosemount, MN. Plots were arranged in a RCB design with 4 replications. Plots consisted of 2 rows 25 ft (7.6 m) long with 30 in (0.8 m) row spacing. A single skip row separated treatments and 10 ft alleys (3.04 m) separated replications. Plots were artificially infested with ECB on 3 Aug. Approximately 25 neonate larvae per ear were placed on 30 primary ears per plot (15 primary ears per row) using a bazooka applicator. Treatment applications were made using a CO2 pressurized backpack sprayer with a single-nozzle wand and an XR-Teejet 8002 flat fan nozzle and no screen. The sprayer was calibrated to deliver 25 gpa (233.8 l/ha) at 35 psi (242 kPa). The ear zone of each row of the 2-row plot was treated beginning at 100% silk. A total of 3 applications were made on the following dates, 31 Jul and 7 and 11 Aug. Twenty-five primary ears per plot were harvested and evaluated 16 Aug. Total number of ECB larvae, larval size and location, and feeding damage (cm2) were recorded.

Mean ECB larval densities were 3.41 per ear in the untreated check (see Table 1). All treatments provided significant control of ECB compared to the untreated check. Percentages of marketable ears for both fresh market and processing were significantly higher in all treatments compared to the untreated check. Warrior T at the high rate produced the highest percentages of marketable ears for fresh market and processing. Kernel feeding damage was significantly lower in all treatments compared to the untreated check. Phytotoxicity was not observed among the treatments.

Table 1: Evaluation of ECB Control, Rosemount, MN, 2000

  Marketable Ears (%)  
Treatment/formulation Rate lb(AI)/ac Mean number of ECB/ear (%control) a Fresh market b Processing c Total kernel feeding damage/ear (cm²) d
Warrior T 0.033 0.08a (98) 92.79 a 93.93 a 0.14 a
Warrior T 0.025 0.14 a (96) 87.00 ab 89.00 ab 0.18 a
Spintor 2SC 0.094 0.18 a (95) 81.91 ab 86.00 ab 0.32 a
Capture 2EC 0.033 0.18 s (95) 79.83 ab 86.96 ab 0.36 a
Mustange 1.5EW 0.05 0.28 a (92) 78.88 ab 78.88 ab 0.46 a
Mustang 1.5EW 0.0375 0.57 a (83) 67.96 b 69.04 b 0.93 a
RH-2485 2F + Latron CS-7 0.06+0.12%v/v 0.55 a (84) 60.89 b 68.06 b 0.63 a
RH-2485 2F + Latron CS-7 0.12+0.12%v/v 0.63 a (82) 64.00 b 69.00 b 1.09 a
Pounce 3.2 EC 0.15 0.58 a (83) 62.00 b 63.00 b 0.74 a
Baythroid 2 0.044 0.64 a (81) 62.29 b 66.33 b 1.04 a
Untreated Check --- 3.41 b (--) 10.63 c 10.63 c 2.99 b

Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P=0.05), Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple range test (REGWQ).
Mean percentage of marketable ears for fresh market and processing were transformed using the arcsin transformation to obtain mean separations using REGWQ (P=0.05); back transformed means are presented.
a Includes all ECB instars in the husk, silk, tip, side, butt, or shank of the ear.
b Percentage of ears with no kernel damage or larvae present.
c Percentage of ears with only small larvae (1-2 instar ECB) and/or damage limited to the tip; no damage or larvae on the side or butt of the ear.
d Total kernel area damaged/ear in the tip, side, or butt by ECB.


Co-Editors: Bill Hutchison, Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, hutch002@tc.umn.edu
Jeanne Ciborowski, IPM Program, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, jeanne.ciborowski@state.mn.us
Cindy Tong, Department of Horticulture, University of Minnesota, ctong@extension.umn.edu
Production Editor: Suzanne Wold, Research Specialist, University of Minnesota, woldx018@tc.umn.edu


{short description of image}{short description of image}


Disclaimer
Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others which may have similar uses. Any person using products listed in this publication assumes full responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer


Last Revised November 17, 2000.
The University, including the Minnesota Extension Service, is an equal opportunity educator and employer.©1999 Minnesota Extension Service, University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Contact copyright@extension.umn.edu for information on reproduction or use of this material.