|
In this issue
Feature Article: Cabbage Looper Takes Off!
Minnesota Vegetable IPM Field Day
Plant Disease Clinic Update - Sample
Guidlines
Potato Leafhopper Infestations on the Rise!
|
| Vol. 3 No. 8 |
|
July 13, 2001 |
Cabbage Looper takes off!
Bill Hutchison and Eric Burkness, Dept. of Entomology, Univ. of
Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn.

Cabbage looper larva |
Cabbage, Broccoli and Cole Crops: View
this as an early warning forecast for significant cabbage looper (CL)
infestations, for the next 3-4 weeks. We have observed a dramatic increase in
CL egg-lay during the past 5 days, at both Rosemount and Apple Valley (Dakota
Co.) and in southeastern Minn. (Houston Co.). At most sites, 75-80% of the
cabbage plants are infested with CL eggs, averaging 3-5/plant. We also have
moderate levels of imported cabbageworm (ICW) and diamondback moth
larvae (DBM) (see photos).
|
Imported cabbageworm larvae |
At this time, growers have 4-6 days (depending
on temperature) to begin to make treatment decisions. With CL and ICW, there is
usually significant natural larval mortality in the 1st and 2nd instar (i.e.,
<1/4 to 3/8 inch size). Our experience over the past 5 years has shown it is
best to wait about 4-5 days after the eggs begin to hatch, and re-sample to
verify that the larval infestation is >10%; if so, then spray at this time,
and re-check fields in 5-7 days.
|

Diamond back moth pupa (top) and adult
(bottom) |
Egg lay and larval infestations for both CL
and ICW can be expected to continue to increase. Fields should be monitored 1-2
times/week to determine infestation levels of CL, ICW, and DBM. Diamondback
moth larval infestations are at 10-20%. However, parasitized diamondback pupae
have been found and parasitism rates can reach up to 90%, which should hold
populations under threshold. Treatment decisions should therefore be based
primarily on the presence of the looper, the most damaging of the three pests,
and ICW. Thresholds are also dependent upon the plant growth stage. The
following thresholds have worked well in recent IPM implementation studies at
Rosemount and Apple Valley, Minn.
|
Plant Growth Stage
|
%Plants Infested
|
Pest Complex
|
| Vegetative (pre-cupping) |
10 |
CL |
| 30 |
ICW and/or DBM |
| Cupping/Head to Harvest |
10 |
CL, ICW, and/or DBM |
Control: Many insecticides are now labeled for the larval pest
complex on cabbage and the related cole crops. The following table
(click here to view table), based on data collected
in 2000, provides a good overview of some of the control provided by several
registered insecticides. As expected, the pyrethroids (Warrior and Capture in
this data set) provide good control of the entire pest complex. SpinTor
(spinosad) is one of the new "alternative" products that also
provides reasonable looper control, yet also conserves more beneficial insects
(e.g., for aphid control, etc.), compared with the pyrethroids. Dipel ES is one
of the conventional Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) products that provides
reasonable control, if applied often enough (every 5-7 days for looper
control). Dipel should still have organic certification (but check local
certification lists).
For more efficacy data on the cabbage insect complex, see the October 22,
1999 article at: http://www.vegedge.umn.edu/mnvegnew/vol1/cab1014.htm
See also cabbage pest fact sheet at:
http://www.vegedge.umn.edu/vegpest/colecrop/cclist.htm
|
Co-Editors: Bill Hutchison, Department of Entomology, University of
Minnesota, hutch002@tc.umn.edu
Jeanne Ciborowski, IPM Program, Minnesota Department of Agriculture,
jeanne.ciborowski@state.mn.us
Cindy Tong, Department of Horticulture, University of Minnesota,
ctong@extension.umn.edu
Production Editor: Suzanne Wold, Research Specialist, University of
Minnesota, woldx018@tc.umn.edu
|
Last Revised July 12, 2001.
The University, including the Minnesota Extension Service, is an equal
opportunity educator and employer.©2001 Minnesota Extension Service,
University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Contact
copyright@extension.umn.edu
for information on reproduction or use of this material.
|